My Objective is to Help You Achieve Yours
Book Review The Management Myth: Why the Experts Keep Getting It WrongMatthew Stewart (2009), W. W. Norton Company ($27.95) © Fred Nickols 2015
|
After reading the closing
paragraph in Stewart's book I jotted down a single word at the end of my
notes: Wow!
I then jotted down what seemed to me to be his
major points:
In addition to the bulleted
zingers cited in the first paragraph above, Stewart also skewers the MBA
degree and its holders, pointing out that those who hold an MBA are
regularly rated lower than their peers who don't have an MBA.
Nor does Stewart exempt CEOs and management
gurus; all are taken to task, including the likes of Tom Peters, Gary
Hamel and even Peter Drucker. As Stewart as was leaving
graduate school for his new-found consulting career, a professor asked him
over lunch, "How can so many who know so little make so much by telling
other people how to the jobs they are paid to know how to do?"
But as Stewart points out, consultants' pay,
no matter how handsome, is chicken feed to their CEO clients.
Perhaps that answers the professor's question. Stewart asserts that management
is "a neglected branch of the humanities, and that the study of management
belongs, if anywhere, to the history of philosophy."
He continues, "For almost a century, a very
different view of the nature of management has held sway in business
schools and among management theorists and consultants."
He then makes clear his aim for the book:
"to
trace the genealogy of this [mistaken] idea, to expose its flaws, and to
replace it."
That "mistaken" view of management Stewart
aims to expose and replace is that of management as "a kind of technology
- a bundle of techniques based on scientific observation, tended by
experts, and transferable to students."
Continuing this line of thought, Stewart
writes that this mistaken idea of management "has sent us on a mistaken
quest to seek scientific answers to unscientific questions."
In essence, when it comes to management,
Stewart says we've got it all wrong and he aims to set things right.
The balance of the book is devoted to that end
and it is well worth reading. In the end, Stewart concludes
that a good manager (or a good consultant for that matter) is nothing more
(or less) than "a good and well-educated person."
Ah, would that it were that simple. Stewart's book weighs in at 343
pages but 40 of those are taken up by a list of references, an appendix
and the index.
The 303 pages of text are an easy and pleasant
read.
Stewart's prose is relaxed and straightforward
(despite being dotted with words like "rebarbative" and "chthonic").
The book is also liberally laced with
fascinating anecdotes and characters. And what about all those words
that drove me to my dictionary?
Well, here's the list: rebarbative, metonymy,
irenic, transubstantiating, homonymy, simulacrum, orphic, deracination,
manqu', interlocutors, meretricious, perspicuous, risibly, copestone,
concupiscent, otiose, anodyne, encomium, chthonic, maleficent.
Of those 20 words, eight were somewhat
familiar to me but 12 were brand-new. Perhaps it was being driven to
the dictionary so often that gave me a degree of perverse pleasure in
spotting two typos in Stewart's book.
On page 117, Stewart writes, "The interview
data, naturally, was easy enough to discard.
"Were" should have been used in place of
"was."
I know, that's nit-picking.
However, on page 233 "may" appears instead of
"my" thus altering "I did it my way" to "I did it may way." Anyway, in the end, Stewart's book is worth reading.
Link to Stewart's Book on Amazon.com
|
This page last updated on August 2, 2019 |